The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) missed a mid-July deadline regarding the listing of the Banggai cardinalfish under the Endangered Species List (ESA). Today a NMFS spokesperson confirmed the Service is still evaluating whether or not listing the species as endangered or threatened is warranted. The now passed mid-July 2014 deadline was the result of a “positive 90-day finding” published in the Federal Register in late February 2014. In that publication, NMFS announced there was “substantial information” in a July 2013 petition* to list the Banggai cardinalfish. By statute, after a positive 90-day finding, NMFS “must conclude the review” of the species in question within 12 months of the date the petition was originally submitted.
12-Month Status Review – “A Huge Task”
In March, I interviewed Therese Conant, the NMFS Endangered Species Conservation Division biologist charged with the Banggai cardinalfish status review. She acknowledged at that time that the status review was a huge task and one that may be difficult to complete by the deadline. “As long as we’re showing reasonable progress,” she told me in a phone interview, “I’m hoping that that will suffice.” She explained that NMFS is very vulnerable if the petitioner decides the Service is “dragging its feet.” In addition to the Banggai cardinalfish status review, Conant is also responsible for the undulate ray status review. The undulate ray is another species included in the WildEarth Guardians petition.
Taylor Jones, an endangered species advocate for WildEarth Guardians, told me today that she has spoken with NMFS and is satisfied the Service is working as fast as they are able. “We will be checking in with them every month,” she says, “but unless they are not making progress we will not take any further action.” It is not uncommon for a petitioning entity like WildEarth Guardians to file a lawsuits if the Federal agency responsible for a review misses a deadline. Despite the missed 12-month status review deadline, Jones says WildEarth Guardians has no plans to sue NMFS at this time. “By the time we brought a lawsuit,” Jones explains, “they might already have finished the projects we were suing about. So in this case, we will hold off a bit and see how the work progresses in the next few months.”
At this point, it is expected that NMFS will release the 12-month findings in batches between now and the end of the year, with the first findings published within a month.
The 12-month status review is an in-depth review which will determine whether or not the petitioned action is warranted. If it is determined that the petition to list the species is warranted, the Service would then publish a proposed rule followed by a 60-day comment period and possible hearings. Within a year, the proposed rule would either become a final rule or be withdrawn.
It is also possible, although unlikely, that the 12-month status review could determine the petition to list the Banggai cardinalfish is “warranted but precluded.” The “warranted but precluded” determination has only been used once by NMFS. According to NMFS officials, it is more likely that NMFS will either deny the petition outright or propose to list the species as threatened or endangered. In the unlikely event the petition is deemed “warranted but precluded,” the species would go on a candidate list with annual review until such time when it is deemed “not warranted” or “warranted.”
The Banggai cardinalfish is both a popular marine aquarium fish and the reef fish with the smallest known endemic range. Because of these two facts, overfishing, increased development and other anthropogenic stressors in Indonesia’s Banggai Islands have led to concerns about the survival of the species in its endemic range. Previous efforts to protect the fish in the Banggai Islands have largely failed. In part the failure is the result of lack of education and insufficient resources for enforcement of existing laws, but it is also because the species has been introduced to other parts of Indonesia where, in some cases, it appears to be thriving. In addition, a large commercial source of aquacultured Banggai cardinalfish has recently become available and has proven capable of meeting 100 percent of market demand further lessening fishing pressure on wild fish.
For those of you who are not familiar with my Banggai cardinalfish work, I have been reporting on the species since 2009. In 2012, I travelled to the remote Banggai islands as the embedded journalist with a scientific team studying the species. My experiences were published in the 2013 book titled Banggai Cardinalfish.
*The petition to list the Banggai cardinalfish submitted by WildEarth Guardians included a total of 81 marine species (23 species of coral, 22 sharks, 15 bony fishes, 10 skates and rays, five marine mammals, three species of hagfishes, and three species of sea snakes). In addition to the Banggai cardinalfish, 26 other species from the petition have now entered status review based on a “substantial” finding. For more information, please see my March 2014 feature for CORAL Magazine, which is available online for free at the Reef to Rainforest website.
Pingback: NMFS Misses Banggai Cardinalfish Status Review Deadline