Senate Bill 322 is the first aquarium fish bill to be introduced to the State of Hawaii’s 28th Legislature. The bill seeks to criminalize the sale of aquatic life for aquarium use and establishes penalties for first and subsequent violations. The bill is co-sponsored by Senators Russell Ruderman, Rosalyn Baker and Suzanne Chun Oakland. While the State’s aquarium fishery is centered around Big Island (the island of Hawaii), there is also a smaller aquarium fishery off O’ahu. This Bill would essentially close the commercial aquarium fishery statewide by prohibiting the sale of aquarium animals harvested in Hawaii. Certain activities and user groups could be excepted or permitted under the new law if it passes.
As the Bill reads,
Selling of aquatic life for aquarium purposes prohibited; penalties; fines. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person at any time to knowingly or intentionally sell or offer to sell, for aquarium purposes, aquatic life taken from any of the waters within the jurisdiction of the State.
It is proposed in the Bill that a first offense would include a fine of not more that $1,000 or thirty days imprisonment (or both). If passed, the new law would take effect 1 January 2016.
Legislators have until 29 January to introduce bills, and at least one other aquarium bill is expected. Representative Cindy Evans’s office confirmed she will be “introducing a bill that would enact a moratorium on aquarium fishing.” She cautioned, however, that “as it works its way through the legislative process she cannot guarantee that she will support the bill in its eventual form.”
While anti-aquarium fishery and trade bills are not new to Hawaii, aquarium fishers have expressed concern about this year’s legislative session given the current make-up of the Legislature. Opponents of Hawaii’s aquarium fishery say they are confident they have public opinion on their side, but aquarium fishers contend the public support is based largely on misinformation about the sustainability of the fishery.
State aquatic biologists have consistently stated the data show Hawaii’s aquarium fishery is one of the best-studied and -managed inshore fisheries in Hawaii. While recent fisheries data continue to show the fishery is being fished sustainability, some anti-trade activists dismiss the data, saying they don’t care whether the fishery is sustainably or not. “Hopefully now the voices of Hawaii will be heard,” said one anti-trade activist, “and our wildlife will be left on our reefs where they belong.”
Please stay tuned to The Good Catch Blog and CORAL Magazine for more updates and analysis.
Pingback: New Hawaii Aquarium Bill Prohibits Harassment of Fishers in a Marine Environment | Good Catch Blog
Pingback: New Bill Proposes 10-Year Moratorium on Aquarium Fishing in Hawaii | Good Catch Blog
Pingback: Hawaii Animal Transport Bill Could Cripple Aquarium Trade | Good Catch Blog
Pingback: House Bill 873 Would Prohibit the Sale of Aquatic Life for Aquarium Purposes | Good Catch Blog
Pingback: HB 883 Defines “Cruel Treatment” of Fishes Harvested in Hawaii Aquarium Fishery | Good Catch Blog
Pingback: Hawaii Aquarium Fishery Related Bill Update | Good Catch Blog
Pingback: The Seventh (and Final) 2015 Aquarium Fishery-Related Bill in Hawaii | Good Catch Blog
Pingback: A Bill to Authorize Inspection of Commercial Catch in West Hawaii | Good Catch Blog