The Seventh (and Final) 2015 Aquarium Fishery-Related Bill in Hawaii

With the cutoff day for the introduction of new bills come and gone in the Hawaii State Legislature, this will be my last post for 2015 on a new anti-aquarium fishery bill. Senate Bill 1340 (SB 1340) was introduced into the Senate on 29 January as a companion bill to House Bill 883 (HB 883). Like HB 883, SB 1340 would prohibit selling or offering for sale any fish or aquatic life taken under an aquarium fish permit subjected to “substantial injury” or “cruel treatment.” The Bill was introduced by Senators Rosalyn Baker, Will Espero, Russell Ruderman, Gilbert Kahele, Michelle Kidani, and Glen Wakai.

Like HB 883, SB 1340 states that:

[R]eef species captured and sold as pet animals are subject to cruel and unethical treatment, including mutilation, puncturing, and confinement, which are common practices by individuals capturing and selling these species.

Because, as the Bill states, “existing laws do not provide adequate protection from cruel treatment,” new laws are necessary. In addition to prohibiting cruel and unethical treatment, SB 1340 also aims to “increase survivability” of aquarium animals harvest in Hawaii’s aquarium fishery.

At the heart of the Bill is the definition of what “Cruel Treatment” means. “Cruel treatment,” SB 1340 reads, “means behavior that may result in substantial injury to the aquarium fish or aquatic life, including but not limited to:”

  1. Surfacing at a rate resulting in physical damage to the body tissue;
  2. Piercing or deflating the swim bladder;
  3. Cutting the fin or spine;
  4. Withholding food for more than twenty-four hours; or
  5. Holding fish or aquatic life in less than one gallon of water, per each specimen, within any container.

If all of these practices were categorically made illegal as a result of this Bill, some aquarium trade experts contend it would have a significant effect on the State’s aquarium fishery and trade. They point out that some of these practices are widely accepted and that the science shows they may actually be in the best interest of the animal’s health and wellbeing. For example, the practice of not feeding fish prior to shipping is so that ammonia doesn’t build up in the shipping water. Many organizations, including the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, recommend withholding food long enough to void the stomach and intestine as a best practice. Senate Bill 670 also includes provision regarding feeding of aquarium fishes prior to shipping.

Seven aquarium fishery-related bills have been introduced into the Hawaii Legislature this year (the others are SB 322, HB511, HB 606, HB 883SB 670 and HB 873). After being introduced, bills will be referred to committee. At that time, public testimony may be appropriate. Stay tuned toThe Good Catch Blog and The Good Catch Blog Facebook page, as well as to CORAL Magazine for the latest on these bills affecting the Hawaii aquarium trade.

About Ret Talbot

Ret Talbot is a freelance writer who covers fisheries at the intersection of science and sustainability. His work has appeared in publications such as National Geographic, Mongabay, Discover Magazine, Ocean Geographic and Coral Magazine. He lives on the coast of Maine with his wife, scientific illustrator Karen Talbot.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Seventh (and Final) 2015 Aquarium Fishery-Related Bill in Hawaii

  1. Pingback: A Bill to Authorize Inspection of Commercial Catch in West Hawaii | Good Catch Blog

  2. Pingback: Hawaii County Council Committee To Consider Potentially Deva

  3. Pingback: Two Hawaii County Council Bills Set for Debate on Tuesday | Good Catch Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s